| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This adds all the kernel side changes for the Optix backend.
Ref D5363
|
|
This will be used by Optix to help the compiler figure out scoping. It is not
used by other devices currently, but worth testing if it helps there too.
Ref D5363
|
|
Use a single loop to iterate over all lights, reducing divergence and amount
of code to generate. Moving ray intersection calls out of conditionals will
also help the Optix compiler.
Ref D5363
|
|
CUDA is working correct without it now, and it's more efficient not to do this.
Ref D5363
|
|
Uninitialized variables are harder to handle for the compiler.
Ref D5363
|
|
Ref D5363
|
|
|
|
This never really worked as it was supposed to. The main goal of this is to
turn noise from sampling tiny hairs into multiple layers of transparency that
do not need to be sampled stochastically. However the implementation of this
worked by randomly discarding hair intersections in BVH traversal, which
defeats the purpose.
If it ever comes back, it's best implemented outside the kernel as a preprocess
that changes hair radius before BVH building. This would also make it work with
Embree, where it's not supported now. But it's not so clear anymore that with
many AA samples and GPU rendering this feature is as helpful as it once was for
CPU raytracers with few AA samples.
The benefit of removing this feature is improved hair ray tracing performance,
tested on NVIDIA Titan Xp:
bmw27: +0.37%
classroom: +0.26%
fishy_cat: -7.36%
koro: -12.98%
pabellon: -0.12%
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D4532
|
|
Apply clang format as proposed in T53211.
For details on usage and instructions for migrating branches
without conflicts, see:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Tools/ClangFormat
|
|
various parts of the CPU kernel
This commit adds a sample-based profiler that runs during CPU rendering and collects statistics on time spent in different parts of the kernel (ray intersection, shader evaluation etc.) as well as time spent per material and object.
The results are currently not exposed in the user interface or per Python yet, to see the stats on the console pass the "--cycles-print-stats" argument to Cycles (e.g. "./blender -- --cycles-print-stats").
Unfortunately, there is no clear way to extend this functionality to CUDA or OpenCL, so it is CPU-only for now.
Reviewers: brecht, sergey, swerner
Reviewed By: brecht, swerner
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3892
|
|
It is supposed to be two spaces before comment stating which if
else/endif statements corresponds to. Was mainly violated in the
header guards.
|
|
|
|
This means the shader can now be used for procedural texturing. New
settings on the node are Samples, Inside, Local Only and Distance.
Original patch by Lukas with further changes by Brecht.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3479
|
|
This is more important now that we will have tigther volume bounds that
we hit multiple times. It also avoids some noise due to RR previously
affecting these surfaces, which shouldn't have been the case and should
eventually be fixed for transparent BSDFs as well.
For non-volume scenes I found no performance impact on NVIDIA or AMD.
For volume scenes the noise decrease and fixed artifacts are worth the
little extra render time, when there is any.
|
|
We now continue transparent paths after diffuse/glossy/transmission/volume
bounces are exceeded. This avoids unexpected boundaries in volumes with
transparent boundaries. It is also required for MIS to work correctly with
transparent surfaces, as we also continue through these in shadow rays.
The main visible changes is that volumes will now be lit by the background
even at volume bounces 0, same as surfaces.
Fixes T53914 and T54103.
|
|
Unify the path and branched path indirect SSS code. No performance impact
found on CUDA, for AMD split kernel the extra code was already there.
|
|
It is basically brute force volume scattering within the mesh, but part
of the SSS code for faster performance. The main difference with actual
volume scattering is that we assume the boundaries are diffuse and that
all lighting is coming through this boundary from outside the volume.
This gives much more accurate results for thin features and low density.
Some challenges remain however:
* Significantly more noisy than BSSRDF. Adding Dwivedi sampling may help
here, but it's unclear still how much it helps in real world cases.
* Due to this being a volumetric method, geometry like eyes or mouth can
darken the skin on the outside. We may be able to reduce this effect,
or users can compensate for it by reducing the scattering radius in
such areas.
* Sharp corners are quite bright. This matches actual volume rendering
and results in some other renderers, but maybe not so much real world
objects.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D3054
|
|
This also fixes a subtle bug in the split kernel branched path SSS, the
volume stack update can't be shared between multiple hit points.
|
|
This can be enabled in the Film panel, with an option to control the
transmisison roughness below which glass becomes transparent.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2904
|
|
|
|
passes
|
|
Goal is to reduce OpenCL kernel recompilations.
Currently viewport renders are still set to use 64 closures as this seems to
be faster and we don't want to cause a performance regression there. Needs
to be investigated.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2775
|
|
With a Titan Xp, reduces path trace local memory from 1092MB to 840MB.
Benchmark performance was within 1% with both RX 480 and Titan Xp.
Original patch was implemented by Sergey.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2249
|
|
|
|
We are already using the AO distance, so might as well offer this extra
control over the intensity. Useful when an interior scene is supposed to
be significantly darker than the background shader.
|
|
|
|
This was originally done with the first sample in the kernel for better
performance, but it doesn't work anymore with atomics. Any benefit was
very minor anyway, too small to measure it seems.
|
|
A little faster on some benchmark scenes, a little slower on others, seems
about performance neutral on average and saves a little memory.
|
|
This is done by storing only a subset of PathRadiance, and by storing
direct light immediately in the main PathRadiance. Saves about 10% of
CUDA stack memory, and simplifies subsurface indirect ray code.
|
|
For the first bounce we now give each BSDF or BSSRDF a minimum sample weight,
which helps reduce noise for a typical case where you have a glossy BSDF with
a small weight due to Fresnel, but not necessarily small contribution relative
to a diffuse or transmission BSDF below.
We can probably find a better heuristic that also enables this on further
bounces, for example when looking through a perfect mirror, but I wasn't able
to find a robust one so far.
|
|
Similar to what we did for area lights previously, this should help
preserve stratification when using multiple BSDFs in theory. Improvements
are not easily noticeable in practice though, because the number of BSDFs
is usually low. Still nice to eliminate one sampling dimension.
|
|
|
|
Previously the Sobol pattern suffered from some correlation issues that
made the outline of objects like a smoke domain visible. This helps
simplify the code and also makes some other optimizations possible.
|
|
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2847
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmarks peformance on GTX 1080 and RX 480 on Linux is the same for
bmw27, classroom, pabellon, and about 2% faster on fishy_cat and koro.
|
|
|
|
Rather than treating all ray types equally, we now always render 1 glossy
bounce and unlimited transmission bounces. This makes it possible to get
good looking results with low AO bounces settings, making it useful to
speed up interior renders for example.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2818
|
|
Need to exit the volume stack when shadow ray laves the medium.
Thanks Brecht for review and help in troubleshooting!
|
|
This was needed when we accessed OSL closure memory after shader evaluation,
which could get overwritten by another shader evaluation. But all closures
are immediatley converted to ShaderClosure now, so no longer needed.
|
|
Also pass by value and don't write back now that it is just a hash for seeding
and no longer an LCG state. Together this makes CUDA a tiny bit faster in my
tests, but mainly simplifies code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added some extra tirckery to avoid background being tinted dark with transparent
surface. Maybe a bit hacky, but seems to work fine.
|
|
Since all the shadow catchers are already assumed to be in the footage,
the shadows they cast on each other are already in the footage too. So
don't just let shadow catchers skip self, but all shadow catchers.
Another justification is that it should not matter if the shadow catcher
is modeled as one object or multiple separate objects, the resulting
render should be the same.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2763
|
|
|
|
transparent object
Tweaked the path radiance summing and alpha to accommodate for possible contribution of
light by transparent surface bounces happening prior to shadow catcher intersection.
This commit will change the way how shadow catcher results looks when was behind semi
transparent object, but the old result seemed to be fully wrong: there were big artifacts
when alpha-overing the result on some actual footage.
|
