| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This way it's more clear whether some issue is caused by lots of geometry in
the node or by lots of "transparent" BVH nodes.
|
|
their expected contribution
In scenes with many lights, some of them might have a very small contribution to some pixels, but the shadow rays are traced anyways.
To avoid that, this patch adds probabilistic termination to light samples - if the contribution before checking for shadowing is below a user-defined threshold, the sample will be discarded with probability (1 - (contribution / threshold)) and otherwise kept, but weighted more to remain unbiased.
This is the same approach that's also used in path termination based on length.
Note that the rendering remains unbiased with this option, it just adds a bit of noise - but if the setting is used moderately, the speedup gained easily outweighs the additional noise.
Reviewers: #cycles
Subscribers: sergey, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2217
|
|
Note that volume rendering is not supported yet, this is a step towards that.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2299
|
|
|
|
Both spot and area light have large areas where they're not visible.
Therefore, this patch stops the light sampling code when one of these cases (outside of the spotlight cone or behind the area light) occurs, before the lamp shader is evaluated.
In the case of the area light, the solid angle sampling can also be skipped.
In a test scene with Sample All Lights and 18 Area lamps and 9 Spot lamps that all point away from the area that the camera sees, render time drops from 12sec to 5sec.
Reviewers: brecht, sergey, dingto, juicyfruit
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2216
|
|
|
|
BVH traversal is not really that much a geometry and we've got
quite some traversals now. Makes sense to keep them separate in
the name of source structure clarity.
|
|
Glossy, Anisotropic and Glass BSDFs
This commit adds a new distribution to the Glossy, Anisotropic and Glass BSDFs that implements the
multiple-scattering microfacet model described in the paper "Multiple-Scattering Microfacet BSDFs with the Smith Model".
Essentially, the improvement is that unlike classical GGX, which only models single scattering and assumes
the contribution of multiple bounces to be zero, this new model performs a random walk on the microsurface until
the ray leaves it again, which ensures perfect energy conservation.
In practise, this means that the "darkening problem" - GGX materials becoming darker with increasing
roughness - is solved in a physically correct and efficient way.
The downside of this model is that it has no (known) analytic expression for evalation. However, it can be
evaluated stochastically, and although the correct PDF isn't known either, the properties of MIS and the
balance heuristic guarantee an unbiased result at the cost of slightly higher noise.
Reviewers: dingto, #cycles, brecht
Reviewed By: dingto, #cycles, brecht
Subscribers: bliblubli, ace_dragon, gregzaal, brecht, harvester, dingto, marcog, swerner, jtheninja, Blendify, nutel
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D2002
|
|
57% less for path and 48% less for branched path.
|
|
|
|
The idea is to switch from allocating separate buffers for shader data's
structure of arrays to allocating one huge memory block and do some index
trickery to make it accessed as SOA.
This saves quite reasonable amount of lines of code in device_opencl and
also makes it possible to get rid of special declaration of ShaderData
structure.
As a side effect it also makes it easier to experiment with SOA vs. AOS
for split kernel.
Works fine here on NVidia GTX580, Intel CPU amd AMD Fiji cards.
Reviewers: #cycles, brecht, juicyfruit, dingto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1593
|
|
It was mainly unfinished code for volume in a split kernel which
should be done differently anyway to avoid such a code copy-paste.
The code didn't really work, so likely nobody will cry.
|
|
|
|
Use KernelGlobals to access all the global arrays for the intermediate
storage instead of passing all this storage things explicitly.
Tested here with Intel OpenCL, NVIDIA GTX580 and AMD Fiji, didn't see
any artifacts, so guess it's all good.
Reviewers: juicyfruit, dingto, lukasstockner97
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1736
|
|
This commit changes the way how we pass bounce information to the Light
Path node. Instead of manualy copying the bounces into ShaderData, we now
directly pass PathState. This reduces the arguments that we need to pass
around and also makes it easier to extend the feature.
This commit also exposes the Transmission Bounce Depth to the Light Path
node. It works similar to the Transparent Depth Output: Replace a
Transmission lightpath after X bounces with another shader, e.g a Diffuse
one. This can be used to avoid black surfaces, due to low amount of max
bounces.
Reviewed by Sergey and Brecht, thanks for some hlp with this.
I tested compilation and usage on CPU (SVM and OSL), CUDA, OpenCL Split
and Mega kernel. Hopefully this covers all devices. :)
|
|
Apparently removing kernel arguments broke NVidia OpenCL.
Needs more investigation, for the time being revering changes which caused problem.
|
|
Should be no functional changes, just simplifies operation with kernels.
|
|
Shadow blocked kernel was using wrong array for storing intersection.
|
|
Ideally we shouldn't use char* at all, but for now we have to, so at least
let's assume common .h files are free from pointer magic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ray intersection
TODO: We might want to refactor debug passes into PASS_DEBUG and some
debug_type (similar to Blender's side passes) to avoid issue of running
out of bits.
|
|
Quite straightforward implementation, but still needs some work for the split
kernel. Includes both regular and split kernel implementation for that.
The pass is not exposed to the interface yet because it's currently not really
easy to have same pass listed in the menu multiple times.
|
|
|
|
This commit re-shuffles code in split kernel once again and makes it so common
parts which is in the headers is only responsible to making all the work needed
for specified ray index. Getting ray index, checking for it's validity and
enqueuing tasks are now happening in the device specified part of the kernel.
This actually makes sense because enqueuing is indeed device-specified and i.e.
with CUDA we'll want to enqueue kernels from kernel and avoid CPU roundtrip.
TODO:
- Kernel comments are still placed in the common header files, but since queue
related stuff is not passed to those functions those comments might need to
be split as well.
Just currently read them considering that they're also covering the way how
all devices are invoking the common code path.
- Arguments might need to be wrapped into KernelGlobals, so we don't ened to
pass all them around as function arguments.
|
|
|
|
The code was failing to compile on runtime because of some path differences,
and it seems we don't need to specify full path to the file which originally
seemed to be needed to make include directives expansion working correct.
|
|
This was broken after the kernel file restructure.
Variables allocated in the __local address space can only be defined
inside a __kernel function.
We probably need to solve this a bit differently once we do the CUDA
kernel split, but this fix shoud be good enough until then.
|
|
Since the kernel split work we're now having quite a few of new files, majority
of which are related on the kernel entry points. Keeping those files in the
root kernel folder will eventually make it really hard to follow which files are
actual implementation of Cycles kernel.
Those files are now moved to kernel/kernels/<device_type>. This way adding extra
entry points will be less noisy. It is also nice to have all device-specific
files grouped together.
Another change is in the way how split kernel invokes logic. Previously all the
logic was implemented directly in the .cl files, which makes it a bit tricky to
re-use the logic across other devices. Since we'll likely be looking into doing
same split work for CUDA devices eventually it makes sense to move logic from
.cl files to header files. Those files are stored in kernel/split. This does not
mean the header files will not give error messages when tried to be included
from other devices and their arguments will likely be changed, but having such
separation is a good start anyway.
There should be no functional changes.
Reviewers: juicyfruit, dingto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D1314
|
