| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We currently don't use those. Skipping creation of stencils for
them gives about 7% speedup of evaluation creation.
|
|
|
|
C-API is way smaller than the rest of the code which uses it.
So better to conditionally compile stub implementation than
to keep adding ifdef everywhere.
|
|
|
|
Enabled infinite sharp patches for topology refiner and evaluator,
which allows to have sharp edge at first subdivision level.
Also tweaked crease export from Blender to OpenSubdiv to have more
artistic control over the whole 0..1 range.
|
|
Before that it was only first UV layer which was properly evaluated,
the rest were ignored. Now all layers are being properly handled.
|
|
Currently unused, added for the future and API completeness.
|
|
The idea is simple: do not provide full topology to OpenSubdiv, leave
edges creation to OpenSubdiv itself. This solves issues with non-manifold
meshes which were known to fail, including the ones from T52059.
On a positive side we can simplify our side of converter, keeping code
shorter.
it is still possible that we'll need to ensure all loops has same
winding, but that is less things to worry about.
|
|
Seems it's behaving correct now, surely more tests needed, but
this is required for now to move forward.
|
|
Applies to vertices and edges. Biggest annoyance here is that OpenSubdiv's
topology converter expects that there is no loose geometry, otherwise it
is getting confused.
For now solution is to create some sort of mapping from real Mesh vertex
and edge index to a non-loose-index. Now the annoying part is that this
is an extra step to calculate before we can compare topology, meaning FPS
will not be as great as if we knew for sure that topology didn't change.
Loose edges subdivision is different from what it used to be with old
subdivision code, but probably nice feature now is that endpoints of loose
edges are stay at the coarse vertex locations. This allows to have things
like plane with hair strands, without need to duplicate edge vertices at
endpoints.
All this required some re-work of topology refiner creation, which is now
only passing edges and vertices which are adjacent to face. This is how
topology refiner is supposed to be used, and this is how its validator
also works. Vertices which are adjacent to loose edges are marked as
infinite sharp. This seems to be good-enough approximation for now. In the
future we might tweaks things a bit and push such vertices in average
direction of loose edges, to match old subdivision code closer.
|
|
There are move changes along the line to keep everything
working from from C.
|
|
Only fixes compilation error, the functionality will be limited.
Currently we don't care that much, since all the work is done in
the branch anyway.
Later on when we'll know which fixes we need to apply on top of
latest OpenSubdiv library we will call a library upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main goal is to make API simpler to follow (at least ion terms what
is defined/declared where, as opposite of handful big headers which
includes all the declarations), and also avoid a big set of long and
obscure functions.
Now C-API files are split into smaller ones, following OpenSubdiv
behavior more closely, and also function pointers in structures
used a lot more, which shortens functions names,
UV integration part in GL Mesh is mainly stripped away, it needs
to be done differently. On a related topic, UV coordinates API in
converter needs to be removed as well, we do not need coordinates,
only island connectivity information there.
Additional changes:
- Varying interpolation in evaluator API are temporarily disabled,
need to extend API somewhere (probably, evaluator's API) to inform
layout information of vertex data (whether it contains varying
data, width, stride and such).
- Evaluator now can interpolate face-varying data.
Only works for adaptive refiner, since some issues in OpenSubdiv
itself.
Planned changes:
- Remove uv coordinates from TopologyConverter.
- Support evaluation of patches (as opposite to individual coordinates
as it happens currently).
- Support more flexible layout of varying and face-varying data.
It is stupid to assume varying is 3 floats and face-varying 2 floats.
- Support of second order derivatives.
- Everything else what i'm missing in this list.
|
