Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
When exiting editmode, customdata [and thus attributes] are copied from
**BMesh** to **Mesh** (in `BM_mesh_bm_to_me`).
When adding attributes, these were always added via
`CustomData_add_layer_named` only.
Instead (if we are in mesh editmode), we need to go through
`BM_data_layer_add_named` to properly update the **BMesh** (see
`update_data_blocks`) so we have stuff available to copy back to
**Mesh** when exiting editmode.
Same is done for removing (also going through BMesh).
This is now done, DomainInfo is updated to point to BMesh (instead of
Mesh) customdata when in editmode.
Maniphest Tasks: T90026
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11998
|
|
This shows the text as part of the assertion message.
|
|
This patch renames two domains:
* `Polygon` -> `Face`
* `Corner` -> `Face Corner`
For the change from `polygon` to `face` I did a "deep rename" where I updated
all (most?) cases where we refere to the attribute domain in code as well.
The change from `corner` to `face corner` is only a ui change. I did not see
a real need to update all code the code for that. It does not seem to improve
the code, more on the contrary.
Ref T86818.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10803
|
|
This is the initial merge from the geometry-nodes branch.
Nodes:
* Attribute Math
* Boolean
* Edge Split
* Float Compare
* Object Info
* Point Distribute
* Point Instance
* Random Attribute
* Random Float
* Subdivision Surface
* Transform
* Triangulate
It includes the initial evaluation of geometry node groups in the Geometry Nodes modifier.
Notes on the Generic attribute access API
The API adds an indirection for attribute access. That has the following benefits:
* Most code does not have to care about how an attribute is stored internally.
This is mainly necessary, because we have to deal with "legacy" attributes
such as vertex weights and attributes that are embedded into other structs
such as vertex positions.
* When reading from an attribute, we generally don't care what domain the
attribute is stored on. So we want to abstract away the interpolation that
that adapts attributes from one domain to another domain (this is not
actually implemented yet).
Other possible improvements for later iterations include:
* Actually implement interpolation between domains.
* Don't use inheritance for the different attribute types. A single class for read
access and one for write access might be enough, because we know all the ways
in which attributes are stored internally. We don't want more different internal
structures in the future. On the contrary, ideally we can consolidate the different
storage formats in the future to reduce the need for this indirection.
* Remove the need for heap allocations when creating attribute accessors.
It includes commits from:
* Dalai Felinto
* Hans Goudey
* Jacques Lucke
* Léo Depoix
|
|
There is a list of attributes, along with operators to add and remove
attributes. For adding, there are a few standard attributes that can be
added quickly, as well as a popup to create a custom attribute.
Ref T76659
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8636
|
|
Instead of custom data layer with special types, using general Vector and Float
attributes.
Ref T76659
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8635
|
|
This puts all generic float/int/vector/color/string geometry attributes in a new
.attributes property. For meshes it provides a more general API for existing
attributes, for point clouds attributes will be used as an essential part of
particle nodes.
This patch was implemented by @lichtwerk, with further changes by me. It's
still a work in progress, but posting here to show what is going on and for
early feedback.
Ref T76659
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8200
|