| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Follows existing naming for the most part, also use "num" as a suffix
in some instances (following our naming conventions).
|
|
Use `verts` instead of `vertices` and `polys` instead of `polygons`
in the API added in 05952aa94d33eeb50. This aligns better with
existing naming where the shorter names are much more common.
|
|
For copy-on-write, we want to share attribute arrays between meshes
where possible. Mutable pointers like `Mesh.mvert` make that difficult
by making ownership vague. They also make code more complex by adding
redundancy.
The simplest solution is just removing them and retrieving layers from
`CustomData` as needed. Similar changes have already been applied to
curves and point clouds (e9f82d3dc7ee, 410a6efb747f). Removing use of
the pointers generally makes code more obvious and more reusable.
Mesh data is now accessed with a C++ API (`Mesh::edges()` or
`Mesh::edges_for_write()`), and a C API (`BKE_mesh_edges(mesh)`).
The CoW changes this commit makes possible are described in T95845
and T95842, and started in D14139 and D14140. The change also simplifies
the ongoing mesh struct-of-array refactors from T95965.
**RNA/Python Access Performance**
Theoretically, accessing mesh elements with the RNA API may become
slower, since the layer needs to be found on every random access.
However, overhead is already high enough that this doesn't make a
noticible differenc, and performance is actually improved in some
cases. Random access can be up to 10% faster, but other situations
might be a bit slower. Generally using `foreach_get/set` are the best
way to improve performance. See the differential revision for more
discussion about Python performance.
Cycles has been updated to use raw pointers and the internal Blender
mesh types, mostly because there is no sense in having this overhead
when it's already compiled with Blender. In my tests this roughly
halves the Cycles mesh creation time (0.19s to 0.10s for a 1 million
face grid).
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D15488
|
|
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
|
|
Also some descriptive text into doc-strings.
|
|
By argument naming and convention this is the intended argument order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 91 spelling corrections, almost all in comments.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D10288
Reviewed by Harley Acheson
|
|
|
|
There are more in the new mesh fairing code and in the poisson
distribution code, this commit doesn't fix those.
|
|
This implements a mesh fairing algorithm and implements the fair
operations for Face Set edit. This edit operations create a smooth as
possible geometry patch in the area of the selected Face Set.
The mesh fairing algorithm is designed by Brett Fedack for the addon
"Mesh Fairing": https://github.com/fedackb/mesh-fairing, with some
modifications:
- The main fairing function in BKE_mesh_fair.h does not triangulate
the mesh. For the test I did in sculpt mode results are good enough
without triangulating the topology. Depending on the use and the
result quality needed for a particular tool, the mesh can be
triangulate in the affected area before starting fairing.
- Cotangents loop weights are not implemented yet. The idea is to
also expose the vertex and loop weights in a different function in
case a tool needs to set up custom weights.
This algorithm will also be used to solve the limitations of line
project and implement the Lasso Project and Polyline Project tools.
It can also be used in tools in other areas of Blender, like Edit Mode
or future retopology tools.
Reviewed By: brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9603
|
