Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.blender.org/blender.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-02-25Refactor: IDTypeInfo: Add `owner_get` to get owner of embedded IDs.Bastien Montagne
This concerns currently only collections (`master_collection` of scenes) and root node trees. It removes the matching type-specific helpers (`BKE_collection_master_scene_search` and `BKE_node_tree_find_owner_ID`). No functional change expected here. NOTE: Current implementation of `owner_get` is far from optimal, we could probably do it better, see {T69169}. NOTE: While it could also have it, shapekeys IDTypeInfo was left out of this change for now. Mainly because it sould not be used currently, and we ultimately want to demote shape keys from ID status anyway.
2021-01-22LibOverride: Add an 'post apply' callback to IDTypeInfo.Bastien Montagne
Currently this is needed to properly tag PointCache's for info update (fixes an issue reported in T82503). Suspect we may need this in more cases in the future though, RNA assign/update processes are not always 100% enough to deal with complicated corner cases.
2020-12-15Geometry Nodes: support evaluating mesh object to geometry setJacques Lucke
This implements the design proposed in T83357. The goal is to allow the geometry nodes modifier on mesh objects to output instances and potentially other geometry types. Both problems are tackled by allowing mesh objects to evaluate to a geometry set, instead of just a single mesh id data block. The geometry set can contain a mesh but also other data like instances and a point cloud. I can't say that I'm sure that this commit won't introduce bugs. Mainly the temporary object creation during rendering seems a bit brittle. BUT, we can be reasonably sure that this commit will not introduce regressions (at least not ones, that are hard to fix). This is because the code has been written in a way that minimizes changes for existing functionality. Given that we intend to hide the point cloud object for the next release, we won't even have to worry about temporary object creation for now. An important part of the technical design is to make sure that `ObjectRuntime->data_eval` contains the same data before and after this patch. This helps to make sure, that existing code paths are impacted as little as possible. Instead of fully replacing `data_eval`, there is `geometry_set_eval`, which contains all the geometry components an object evaluated to (including the data referenced by `data_eval`). For now, not much code has to be aware of `geometry_set_eval`. Mainly the depsgraph object iterator and the instances system have to know about it. Reviewers: brecht Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9851
2020-12-10Geometry Nodes: rename modifyPointCloud to modifyGeometrySetJacques Lucke
Since the initial merge of the geometry nodes project, the modifyPointCloud function already was already modifying a geometry set. The function wasn't renamed back then, because then the merge would have touched many more files. Ref T83357.
2020-12-02Geometry Nodes: initial scattering and geometry nodesJacques Lucke
This is the initial merge from the geometry-nodes branch. Nodes: * Attribute Math * Boolean * Edge Split * Float Compare * Object Info * Point Distribute * Point Instance * Random Attribute * Random Float * Subdivision Surface * Transform * Triangulate It includes the initial evaluation of geometry node groups in the Geometry Nodes modifier. Notes on the Generic attribute access API The API adds an indirection for attribute access. That has the following benefits: * Most code does not have to care about how an attribute is stored internally. This is mainly necessary, because we have to deal with "legacy" attributes such as vertex weights and attributes that are embedded into other structs such as vertex positions. * When reading from an attribute, we generally don't care what domain the attribute is stored on. So we want to abstract away the interpolation that that adapts attributes from one domain to another domain (this is not actually implemented yet). Other possible improvements for later iterations include: * Actually implement interpolation between domains. * Don't use inheritance for the different attribute types. A single class for read access and one for write access might be enough, because we know all the ways in which attributes are stored internally. We don't want more different internal structures in the future. On the contrary, ideally we can consolidate the different storage formats in the future to reduce the need for this indirection. * Remove the need for heap allocations when creating attribute accessors. It includes commits from: * Dalai Felinto * Hans Goudey * Jacques Lucke * Léo Depoix
2020-11-09Pointclouds: move blenkernel code to c++Jacques Lucke