| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Use the correct modifier struct name
|
|
This revisit the render pipeline to support time slicing for better motion
blur.
We support accumulation with or without the Post-process motion blur.
If using the post-process, we reuse last step next motion data to avoid
another scene reevaluation.
This also adds support for hair motion blur which is handled in a similar
way as mesh motion blur.
The total number of samples is distributed evenly accross all timesteps to
avoid sampling weighting issues. For this reason, the sample count is
(internally) rounded up to the next multiple of the step count.
Only FX Motion BLur: {F8632258}
FX Motion Blur + 4 time steps: {F8632260}
FX Motion Blur + 32 time steps: {F8632261}
Reviewed By: jbakker
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8079
|
|
This will allow the easier addition of a constant radius mode in the
future and some changes in the UI to mirror the recent similar change
from "Only Vertices" to the "Affect" enum.
|
|
This patch implements the list panel system D7490 for grease pencil
shader effects. It also moves their drawing to a callback in
ShaderFxTypeInfo in line with the extensible architecture refactoring
goal T75724.
The implementation is basically exactly the same as for the modifier
patch (9b099c86123fc82).
Thanks to Matias Mendiola (@mendio) for helping to develop the layout
changes.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7985
|
|
This patch implements the list panel system D7490 for grease pencil
modifiers. It also moves their drawing to a callback in
GpencilModifierTypeInfo in line with the extensible architecture
refactoring goal T75724.
This also adds the "set_error" function for grease pencil modifiers,
which hadn't been copied from mesh modifiers yet.
The implementation is basically exactly the same as for the modifier
patch (9b099c86123fc82).
Thanks to Matias Mendiola (mendio) for providing mockups for many
of the layout changes.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7978
|
|
This patch implements the list panel system D7490 for constraints.
In this case the panels are still defined in Python.
The layouts are also updated to use subpanels and the a more organized
single column layout. There may be more tweaks necessary for the
layouts.
Reviewed By: Severin, billreynish, Mets
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7499
|
|
This adds object motion blur vectors for EEVEE as well as better noise
reduction for it.
For TAA reprojection we just compute the motion vector on the fly based on
camera motion and depth buffer. This makes possible to store another motion
vector only for the blurring which is not useful for TAA history fetching.
Motion Data is saved per object & per geometry if using deformation blur.
We support deformation motion blur by saving previous VBO and modifying the
actual GPUBatch for the geometry to include theses VBOs.
We store Previous and Next frame motion in the same motion vector buffer
(RG for prev and BA for next). This makes non linear motion blur (like
rotating objects) less prone to outward/inward blur.
We also improve the motion blur post process to expand outside the objects
border. We use a tile base approach and the max size of the blur is set via
a new render setting.
We use a background reconstruction method that needs another setting
(Background Separation).
Sampling is done using a fixed 8 dithered samples per direction. The final
render samples will clear the noise like other stochastic effects.
One caveat is that hair particles are not yet supported. Support will
come in another patch.
Reviewed By: jbakker
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7297
|
|
This patch implements the list panel system D7490 for modifiers.
It also moves modifier drawing to a callback in ModifierTypeInfo
in line with the extensible architecture refactoring goal T75724.
This adds a PanelRegister callback and utilities for registering
panels and subpanels. It also adds the callbacks for expansion saving
and drag and drop reordering described in D7490.
These utilities, callbacks, and other common UI elements shared
between modifiers live in MOD_ui_common.c.
Because modifier buttons are now in panels, we can make use of
subpanels for organization. The UI layouts also use the single
column layout style consistently used elsewhere in Blender.
Additionally, the mode-setting buttons are aligned and ordered
consistently with the outliner.
However, the large number of UI changes in this patch may mean
that additional polishing is required in master.
Thanks to William Reynish (@billreynish) who did a fair amount of the
layout work and to Julian Eisel (@Severin) for consistent help.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7498
|
|
|
|
Own fault in some recent patch rewiew/commit...
|
|
Original patch by Cody Winchester (@CodyWinch), several fixes and
cleanup by Bastien Montagne (@mont29).
Differential revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7656
|
|
Seriously... Please comply with design and do not add 2.9x versionning
code to 2.8x versioning functions!
|
|
Changes for 2.90 versioning.
|
|
Now the brushes have several new random settings and use curves to define the effect. The curves have been moved below the parameter to keep UI standards and extra curve panels have been removed.
{F8505387}
The new curves are:
* Hue.
* Saturation.
* Value.
New option to random at stroke level instead to random at point level for the following values:
* Thickness.
* Strength.
* UV.
* Hue.
* Saturation.
* Value.
Curves have been moved below the corresponding parameter and only are displayed in properties panel. Display the curves in the popover made it unusable.
{F8505392}
Also, the Pressure random has been renamed to Radius because the old name was not clear enough.
Reviewed By: mendio, pablovazquez
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7577
|
|
- Allow 0.0..1.0 range, as even at 0.0 the selection is still visible.
- Correct versioning code, not to overwrite the value for new files.
|
|
Add this option as it's useful to adjust how much UV's
cover the image when UV mapping.
D5348 by @EitanSomething with edits
|
