| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years ago, Bug T44961 about unwanted spikes had me not do a loop
slide if the angle was too extreme, to avoid unwanted spikes.
The current bug showed that that angle was much too big, and limited
desired behavior in many cases. Changing the angle from 0.25 radians
to 0.0001 radians (about 0.006 degrees) still fixes the original bug
and seems very unlikely to be limiting desired behavior now.
|
|
This shows the text as part of the assertion message.
|
|
Also use doxy style function reference `#` prefix chars when
referencing identifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These were limited to obvious cases. Some less obvious cases
were kept as refactoring might make them necessary in future.
|
|
|
|
When polygons around a bevel are rebuilt, sometimes UVs are merged
around a new vertex in the case of the face opposite a single edge
being beveled on a 3-edge vertex. This should not have been done
if any of the edges at that vertex were a seam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
While Boolean is not guaranteed to work if the operands are not
volume-enclosing (technically: PWN - piecewise constant winding number),
it needs to do something in those cases. This change makes
more cases meet user expectations in T84493, T64544, T83403,
T82642 (though very slow on that one).
The original new boolean code used "generalized winding number"
for this fallback; replaced this with code that uses raycasting.
Raycasting would have been faster, but for unfortunately also
switchd to per-triangle tests rather than per-patch tests since
it is possible (e.g., with Suzanne) to have patches that are
both inside and outside the other shape. That can make it much
slower in some cases, sadly.
|
|
|
|
The previous fix to the width modes Percent and Absolute did
not take into account that with limit mode Weight, the amount
needs to be scaled by the bevel weight of the beveled edge in
question. (Sometimes there are two beveled edges in question,
in which case an average is used.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Needed a better normal to for plane to offset into when there are
non in-plane edges between two beveled edges. It was using the vertex
normal, which is just wrong.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9508
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes debugging slightly easier, and makes the code slightly more
explicit about its intentions.
|
|
In some situations where two beveled edges were very close to in-line
but not quite straight, bevel would build a miter when it shouldn't.
The code that chose whether to use a miter at each vertex was slightly
incorrect.
For outer miters there is a check for 3 or more selected edges, but an
inner miter can still be useful with only two beveled edges at a vertex,
so we can't use that here. Instead I changed the check for in-line edges
to run before determining whether the angle is reflex or not. The logic
ends up a bit more straightforward as well. This doesn't completely
remove the rather strange looking triangle vertex meshes at each corner,
but it does make it stable when locations are slightly adjusted.
The only other place this `edges_angle_kind` function was used is for
profile=1.0 vertex meshes. I tested and made sure that still works well.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9420
|
|
The previous fix forgot the case where there is an intermediate
edge and everything isn't in one plane.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9336
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code for Bevel's percent (and absolute) modes were pretty bogus.
It assumed, like the rest of the modes, that the offset lines are
parallel to the beveled edge. Which is not true for these modes,
though it accidentally works sometimes if the legs are equilength.
Also the clamping code for those modes was completey wrong.
It is too hard to really fix the clamping code for absolute mode,
but it is a little better now. Percent mode clamping is fixed.
|
|
Check the simpler case first and return early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exit early if the bevel width is zero instead of putting
the main function in an if statement.
|
|
This commit generally moves variable declarations to the smallest scope
the variables are used in. This makes the code more readable by
making it clearer when variables are used and by removing the block
of variable declarations at the top of each function.
|
|
|
|
Also order sizeof(..) first to promote other values to size_t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously a for loop with two iterations was used to calculate the
3D segment locations for the input number and the higher power of 2.
Splitting off the inside of the for loop to a separate function makes
the code more readable.
This commit also includes a simple timer for bevel, enabled with a
define. Interestingly, the cleanup in this commit happended to give
a 3% speedup on a Ryzen 3700x for a bevel calculation with 64
segments.
|
|
|
|
The bevel code initialized the CurveProfile with the "higher power of 2"
segments after the normal number of segments, leaving the widget in an
incorrect state after the calculation. A simple fix is to re-order the
initializations, doing the input number second.
|
|
|
|
The abbreviation 'init' is brief, unambiguous and already used
in thousands of places, also initialize is often accidentally
written with British spelling.
|
|
New code to calculate UV islands made an incorrect assumption about
maximum stack size.
|
|
New code to calculate UV islands made an incorrect assumption about
the maximum size of a stack.
|
|
This matches the change that was done to the bevel modifier so that the
interface for the modifier, the active tool, and the operator are consistent.
This commit extends the refactor to the bmesh implementation too, so
that the parameters in the implementation don't stray too far from what
is exposed.
Tests are adjusted and still pass.
|
|
A bug introduced when I made the choice of interpolation face cleverer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This addresses warnings from Clang-Tidy's `readability-else-after-return`
rule in the `source/blender/bmesh` module.
No functional changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Howard for double-checking!
|
