| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit renames enums related the "Curve" object type and ID type
to add `_LEGACY` to the end. The idea is to make our aspirations clearer
in the code and to avoid ambiguities between `CURVE` and `CURVES`.
Ref T95355
To summarize for the record, the plans are:
- In the short/medium term, replace the `Curve` object data type with
`Curves`
- In the longer term (no immediate plans), use a proper data block for
3D text and surfaces.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14114
|
|
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
|
|
Based on discussions from T95355 and T94193, the plan is to use
the name "Curves" to describe the data-block container for multiple
curves. Eventually this will replace the existing "Curve" data-block.
However, it will be a while before the curve data-block can be replaced
so in order to distinguish the two curve types in the UI, "Hair Curves"
will be used, but eventually changed back to "Curves".
This patch renames "hair-related" files, functions, types, and variable
names to this convention. A deep rename is preferred to keep code
consistent and to avoid any "hair" terminology from leaking, since the
new data-block is meant for all curve types, not just hair use cases.
The downside of this naming is that the difference between "Curve"
and "Curves" has become important. That was considered during
design discussons and deemed acceptable, especially given the
non-permanent nature of the somewhat common conflict.
Some points of interest:
- All DNA compatibility is lost, just like rBf59767ff9729.
- I renamed `ID_HA` to `ID_CV` so there is no complete mismatch.
- `hair_curves` is used where necessary to distinguish from the
existing "curves" plural.
- I didn't rename any of the cycles/rendering code function names,
since that is also used by the old hair particle system.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14007
|
|
The modifiers are mapped between original and evaluated objects based on
their session IDs. The pointer to original modifier is no longer needed
for the backup: it remained from the initial implementation which was
rewritten at some point.
This is a preparation for removal of the pointer to original modifier.
|
|
With this commit, curve objects support the geometry nodes modifier.
Curves objects now evaluate to `CurveEval` unless there was a previous
implicit conversion (tessellating modifiers, mesh modifiers, or the
settings in the curve "Geometry" panel). In the new code, curves are
only considered to be the wire edges-- any generated surface is a mesh
instead, stored in the evaluated geometry set.
The consolidation of concepts mentioned above allows remove a lot of
code that had to do with maintaining the `DispList` type temporarily
for modifiers and rendering. Instead, render engines see a separate
object for the mesh from the mesh geometry component, and when the
curve object evaluates to a curve, the `CurveEval` is always used for
drawing wire edges.
However, currently the `DispList` type is still maintained and used as
an intermediate step in implicit mesh conversion. In the future, more
uses of it could be changed to use `CurveEval` and `Mesh` instead.
This is mostly not changed behavior, it is just a formalization of
existing logic after recent fixes for 2.8 versions last year and two
years ago. Also, in the future more functionality can be converted
to nodes, removing cases of implicit conversions. For more discussion
on that topic, see T89676.
The `use_fill_deform` option is removed. It has not worked properly
since 2.62, and the choice for filling a curve before or after
deformation will work much better and be clearer with a node system.
Applying the geometry nodes modifier to generate a curve is not
implemented with this commit, so applying the modifier won't work
at all. This is a separate technical challenge, and should be solved
in a separate step.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11597
|
|
Handle Lattice object the same way as Mesh objects. This is mostly to
execute the `object->data = data_eval;` line, which ensures that the
evaluated mesh is assigned to the evaluated object, and thus prevents
the lattice from un-deforming.
|
|
No functional changes.
|
|
|
|
Solves possible pointer-based comparison fiasco.
Another nice outcome of this is that topology cache will now be
preserved throughout the undo system. For example, undo of object
transform will not require topology cache to be re-created.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8493
|
|
Fixes possible fiasco caused by re-allocation re-using pointers between
pose channels.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8453
|
|
Reviewers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D8150
|
|
`std::optional` can be used now, because we switched to C++17.
|
|
We decided to use our own map data structure in general for better
readability and performance.
Reviewers: sergey
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7987
|
|
|
|
Only the volume object is exposed in the user interface. It is based on OpenVDB
internally. Drawing and rendering code will follow in another commit.
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Objects/Volume
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.83/Volumes
Hair and PointCloud object types are hidden behind a WITH_NEW_OBJECT_TYPES
build option. These are unfinished, and included only to make it easier to
cooperate on development in the future and avoid tricky merges.
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Source/Objects/New_Object_Types
Ref T73201, T68981
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6945
|
|
This is in preparation of new object types. This only changes mesh_eval, we
may do the same for mesh_deform_eval and other areas in the future if there is
a need for it.
This previously caused a bug in T74283, that should be fixed now.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6695
|
|
than mesh"
This reverts commit f2b95b9eae2ee913c99cff7595527b18d8b49d0a.
Fix T74283: modifier display lost when moving object in edit mode.
The cause is not immediately obvious so better to revert and look at this
carefully.
|
|
This is in preparation of new object types. This only changes mesh_eval, we
may do the same for mesh_deform_eval and other areas in the future if there is
a need for it.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D6695
|
|
No functional changes.
|
|
It started to be a long code of all various cases in a single file,
which started to be really confusing.
|
