Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This evaluator is used in order to evaluate subdivision at render time, allowing for
faster renders of meshes with a subdivision surface modifier placed at the last
position in the modifier list.
When evaluating the subsurf modifier, we detect whether we can delegate evaluation
to the draw code. If so, the subdivision is first evaluated on the GPU using our own
custom evaluator (only the coarse data needs to be initially sent to the GPU), then,
buffers for the final `MeshBufferCache` are filled on the GPU using a set of
compute shaders. However, some buffers are still filled on the CPU side, if doing so
on the GPU is impractical (e.g. the line adjacency buffer used for x-ray, whose
logic is hardly GPU compatible).
This is done at the mesh buffer extraction level so that the result can be readily used
in the various OpenGL engines, without having to write custom geometry or tesselation
shaders.
We use our own subdivision evaluation shaders, instead of OpenSubDiv's vanilla one, in
order to control the data layout, and interpolation. For example, we store vertex colors
as compressed 16-bit integers, while OpenSubDiv's default evaluator only work for float
types.
In order to still access the modified geometry on the CPU side, for use in modifiers
or transform operators, a dedicated wrapper type is added `MESH_WRAPPER_TYPE_SUBD`.
Subdivision will be lazily evaluated via `BKE_object_get_evaluated_mesh` which will
create such a wrapper if possible. If the final subdivision surface is not needed on
the CPU side, `BKE_object_get_evaluated_mesh_no_subsurf` should be used.
Enabling or disabling GPU subdivision can be done through the user preferences (under
Viewport -> Subdivision).
See patch description for benchmarks.
Reviewed By: campbellbarton, jbakker, fclem, brecht, #eevee_viewport
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12406
|
|
`MeshBufferList` is more specific and can avoid confusion with
`MeshBufferExtractionCache`.
|
|
`MeshBufferCache` is a struct representing a list of buffers.
As such, `GPUIndexBuf **tris_per_mat` is out of place as it does not
represent one of the buffers in the list.
In fact this member should be close to `GPUBatch **surface_per_mat` as
they are related.
The code for dependencies between buffer and batch had to be reworked
as it relies on the member's position.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D12227
|
|
In the draw module, it's not easy to identify what its header is, and
where the shared functions are.
So move `draw_cache_extract_mesh_extractors.c` and
`draw_cache_extract_mesh_private.h` to the same folder as the extractors
and rename these files to make them more identifiable.
Reviewed By: jbakker
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11991
|
|
The `ibo.tris` extraction in multithread is currently only done if the
mesh has only 1 material.
Now we cache a map indicating the index of each polygon after sort and
thus allow the extraction of tris with materials in multithreaded.
As caching is a heavy operation and was already being performed in
multi-thread for triangle offsets, no significant improvements are
expected.
The benefit will be much greater when we can skip updating the cache
while transforming a geometry.
**Profiling:**
||master:|PATCH:
|---|---|---|
|large_mesh_editing_materials:|Average: 13.855380 FPS|Average: 15.525684 FPS
||rdata 9ms iter 36ms (frame 71ms)|rdata 9ms iter 29ms (frame 64ms)
|subdiv_mesh_final_only_materials:|Average: 28.113742 FPS|Average: 28.633599 FPS
||rdata 0ms iter 1ms (frame 36ms)|rdata 0ms iter 1ms (frame 35ms)
1.1x overall speedup
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11445
|
|
|
|
When using multiple materials in a single mesh the most time is spend in
counting the offsets of each material for the sorting.
This patch moves the counting of the offsets to render mesh data and
caches it as long as the geometry doesn't change.
This patch doesn't include multithreading of this code.
Reviewed By: mano-wii
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11612
|
|
One drawback to trying to predict the number of threads that will be
used in the `task_graph` is that we are only sure of the number when the
threads are running.
Using `BLI_task_parallel_range` allows the driver to
choose the best thread distribution through `parallel_reduce`.
The benefit is most evident on hardware with fewer cores.
This is the result on an 4-core laptop:
||before:|after:
|---|---|---|
|large_mesh_editing:|Average: 5.203638 FPS|Average: 5.398925 FPS
||rdata 15ms iter 43ms (frame 193ms)|rdata 14ms iter 36ms (frame 187ms)
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11558
|
|
This is an adaptation of {D11488}.
A disadvantage of manually setting the iter ranges per thread is that
we don't know how many threads are running in the background and so we
don't know how to best distribute the ranges.
To solve this limitation we can use `parallel_reduce` and thus let the
driver choose the best distribution of ranges among the threads.
This proved to be especially beneficial for computers with few cores.
**Benchmarking:**
Here's the result on an 4-core laptop:
||master:|PATCH:
|---|---|---|
|large_mesh_editing:|Average: 5.203638 FPS|Average: 5.398925 FPS
||rdata 15ms iter 43ms (frame 193ms)|rdata 14ms iter 36ms (frame 187ms)
Here's the result on an 8-core PC:
||master:|PATCH:
|---|---|---|
|large_mesh_editing:|Average: 15.267482 FPS|Average: 15.906881 FPS
||rdata 9ms iter 28ms (frame 65ms)|rdata 9ms iter 25ms (frame 63ms)
|large_mesh_editing_ledge: |Average: 15.145966 FPS|Average: 15.520474 FPS
||rdata 9ms iter 29ms (frame 65ms)|rdata 9ms iter 25ms (frame 64ms)
|looptris_test:|Average: 4.001917 FPS|Average: 4.061105 FPS
||rdata 12ms iter 90ms (frame 236ms)|rdata 12ms iter 87ms (frame 230ms)
|subdiv_mesh_cage_and_final:|Average: 1.917769 FPS|Average: 1.971790 FPS
||rdata 7ms iter 37ms (frame 261ms)|rdata 7ms iter 31ms (frame 258ms)
||rdata 7ms iter 38ms (frame 252ms)|rdata 7ms iter 33ms (frame 249ms)
|subdiv_mesh_final_only:|Average: 6.387240 FPS|Average: 6.591251 FPS
||rdata 3ms iter 25ms (frame 151ms)|rdata 3ms iter 16ms (frame 145ms)
|subdiv_mesh_final_only_ledge:|Average: 6.247393 FPS|Average: 6.596024 FPS
||rdata 3ms iter 26ms (frame 158ms)|rdata 3ms iter 16ms (frame 148ms)
**Notes:**
- The improvement can only be noticed if all extracts are multithreaded.
- This patch touches different areas of the code, so it can be split into another patch if the idea is accepted.
These screenshots show how threads behave in a quadcore:
Master:
{F10164664}
Patch:
{F10164666}
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11558
|
|
This patch adds a specific extraction method when the mesh has only
one material. This method is multi-threaded.
There is a trade-off in this patch as the ibo isn't compressed (it adds
restart indexes for hidden faces). So it depends if threading is faster
than the additional GPU buffer upload.
# Subdivided cube
I used a cube subdivided 7 times, modifiers applied. that gives around 400000 faces.
The test is selecting some vertices and move them. During this test the next buffers are updated on each frame:
* vbo.pos_nor
* vbo.lnor
* vbo.edit_data
* ibo.tris
* ibo.points
System info:
|platform| Linux-5.11.0-7614-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.33|
| renderer| AMD SIENNA_CICHLID (DRM 3.40.0, 5.11.0-7614-generic, LLVM 11.0.1)|
|vendor| AMD|
|version| 4.6 (Core Profile) Mesa 21.0.1|
|cpu| Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz|
|compiler| gcc version 10.3.0|
Timing have been measured using DEBUG_TIME in `draw_cache_extract_mesh`.
master: `rdata 8ms iter 45ms (frame 153ms)`
this patch `rdata 6ms iter 36ms (frame 132ms)`
Reviewed By: mano-wii
Maniphest Tasks: T88352
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D11290
|
|
This reverts commit 43464c94f4def8689dd99a9e459f5ff77420d27b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|