| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Don't always create a new geometry nodes node tree when adding a
geometry nodes modifier.
This avoids files getting cluttered with empty and unused geometry node
trees that are created every time a nodes modifier is added to an
object - even if only to apply an already existing.
This is also more consistent with other modifiers that also don't
automatically create new data blocks.
The new modifier still automatically gets populated with a new node
tree when adding it via the "New" button in the header of the
geometry nodes editor.
Reviewed By: Hans Goudey, Dalai Felinto, Pablo Vazquez
Differential Revision: D14458
|
|
Value-initialization has the potential to be more efficient.
Also, the code becomes simpler.
|
|
Also rename DNA struct members.
|
|
Follow conventions from T85728.
|
|
|
|
This implements the same interpolation method as for bevel weights
now for vertex and edge creases as well to improve the flexibility.
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D14170
|
|
- Deprecated headers
- Else after return
- Inconsistent parameter names (I used the most recently modified)
- Raw string literals
|
|
|
|
This moves `MOD_meshsequencecache.c` to C++ and fixes compile warnings
introduced from the change. This uses C++ style casts, as well as
`nullptr` instead of `NULL`.
This will allow to output `GeometrySets` from the modifier, which is C++.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13662
|
|
Currently there is a "calc_face_normal" argument to mesh to bmesh
conversion, but vertex normals had always implicitly inherited whatever
dirty state the mesh input's vertex normals were in. Probably they were
most often assumed to not be dirty, but this was never really correct in
the general case.
Ever since the refactor to move vertex normals out of mesh vertices,
cfa53e0fbeed7178c7, the copying logic has been explicit: copy the
normals when they are not dirty. But it turns out that more control is
needed, and sometimes normals should be calculated for the resulting
BMesh.
This commit adds an option to the conversion to calculate vertex
normals, true by default. In almost all places except the decimate
and edge split modifiers, I just copied the value of the
"calc_face_normals" argument.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14406
|
|
Typo (copy/paste mistake) in rB923b28aab85768e2b.
|
|
Since 3b6ee8cee7080af20, a list of vertex groups cannot be retrieved
from curve objects for merging because curve objects do not support
vertex groups. Previously the empty list on the object was returned.
Only mesh objects are supported for the caps.
|
|
This is a follow up to rB2252bc6a5527cd7360d1ccfe7a2d1bc640a8dfa6.
|
|
For more detail about `CPPType`, see `BLI_cpp_type.hh` and D14367.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14367
|
|
This commit removes the implementations of legacy nodes,
their type definitions, and related code that becomes unused.
Now that we have two releases that included the legacy nodes,
there is not much reason to include them still. Removing the
code means refactoring will be easier, and old code doesn't
have to be tested and maintained.
After this commit, the legacy nodes will be undefined in the UI,
so 3.0 or 3.1 should be used to convert files to the fields system.
The net change is 12184 lines removed!
The tooltip for legacy nodes mentioned that we would remove
them before 4.0, which was purposefully a bit vague to allow
us this flexibility. In a poll in a devtalk post showed that the
majority of people were okay with removing the nodes.
https://devtalk.blender.org/t/geometry-nodes-backward-compatibility-poll/20199
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14353
|
|
|
|
So far it was needed to declare a new RNA struct to `RNA_access.h` manually.
Since 9b298cf3dbec we generate a `RNA_prototypes.h` for RNA property
declarations. Now this also includes the RNA struct declarations, so they don't
have to be added manually anymore.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13862
Reviewed by: brecht, campbellbarton
|
|
Activating a gizmo used the windows eventstate which may have values
newer than the event used to activate the gizmo.
This meant transforms check for the key that activated transform
could be incorrect.
Support passing an event when calling operators to avoid this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correct misspellings in code comments of "vertex" and "vertices".
See D13932 for more details.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13932
Reviewed by Harley Acheson
|
|
|
|
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14225
|
|
This fix contains two parts. There was one critical mistake where
order of two indices was wrong when removing constraint planes from
the array. The other changes are improvements to the used thresholds
to keep everything numerically stable.
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D14183
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the normal edit modifier calculated the normals on one
mesh with the "ensure" functions, then copied the mesh and retrieved
the layers "for write" on the copy. Since 59343ee1627f4c369e23, normal
layers are never copied, and normals are allocated with malloc instead
of calloc, so the mutable memory was uninitialized.
Fix by calculating normals on the correct mesh, and also add a warning
to the "for write" functions in the header.
|
|
|
|
These features are complicated to support on GPU and hardly compatible
with subdivision in the first place. In the future, with T68891 and
T68893, subdivision and custom smooth shading will be separate workflows.
For now, and to better prepare for this future (although long term
plan), we should discourage workflows mixing subdivision and custom
smooth normals, and as such, this disables GPU subdivision when
autosmoothing or custom split normals are used.
This also adds a message in the modifier's UI to indicate that GPU
subdivision will be disabled if autosmooth or custom split normals are
used on the mesh.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14194
|
|
These were only set in two places. One was related to "tessellated loop
normal", and the other derived corner normals. The values were never
checked though, after 59343ee1627f4c369. The handling of dirty face
corner normals is clearly problematic, but in the future it should be
handled like the normal layers on the other domains instead.
Ref D14154, T95839
|
|
|
|
Limit the min and max of the IDProperty for the node group input
from 0 to infinity, and the soft min and max between 0 and 1.
Thanks to @PratikPB2123 for investigation.
|
|
The constraints solver is now able to handle more cases correctly.
Also the behavior of the boundary fixes is slightly changed if
the constraints thickness mode is used.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14143
|
|
The modifier supports arithmetic operations, like Add or Multiply,
but for some reason omits Minimum and Maximum. They are similarly
simple and useful math functions and should be supported.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14164
|
|
|
|
It's better not to expose the details of where the dirty flags are
stored to every place that wants to know if the normals are dirty.
Some of these places are relics from before vertex normals were
computed lazily anyway, so this is more of an incrememtal cleanup.
This will make part of the fix for T95839 simpler.
|
|
This commit renames enums related the "Curve" object type and ID type
to add `_LEGACY` to the end. The idea is to make our aspirations clearer
in the code and to avoid ambiguities between `CURVE` and `CURVES`.
Ref T95355
To summarize for the record, the plans are:
- In the short/medium term, replace the `Curve` object data type with
`Curves`
- In the longer term (no immediate plans), use a proper data block for
3D text and surfaces.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14114
|
|
|
|
For the attribute search button, the tooltip was missing
if the input socket type has attribute toggle activated.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14142
|
|
|
|
StringGrid has been deprecated in openvdb 9.0.0 and will be removed soon
Reviewed By: Brecht
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D14133
|
|
|
|
The crash is caused as we did not check that the RNA pointer is null
before trying to use it. This moves the existing checks from the
modifier panels into the template functions so the logic is a bit
centralized.
|
|
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
|
|
|
|
Complex Solidify creates edge bevel weights on the rim if the
according vertex has some vertex bevel weight. If there are no
edge bevel weights, they were left disabled even if vertex bevel
weights are used.
|
|
|
|
Also fixes T95611 and T95610.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14051
|
|
Based on discussions from T95355 and T94193, the plan is to use
the name "Curves" to describe the data-block container for multiple
curves. Eventually this will replace the existing "Curve" data-block.
However, it will be a while before the curve data-block can be replaced
so in order to distinguish the two curve types in the UI, "Hair Curves"
will be used, but eventually changed back to "Curves".
This patch renames "hair-related" files, functions, types, and variable
names to this convention. A deep rename is preferred to keep code
consistent and to avoid any "hair" terminology from leaking, since the
new data-block is meant for all curve types, not just hair use cases.
The downside of this naming is that the difference between "Curve"
and "Curves" has become important. That was considered during
design discussons and deemed acceptable, especially given the
non-permanent nature of the somewhat common conflict.
Some points of interest:
- All DNA compatibility is lost, just like rBf59767ff9729.
- I renamed `ID_HA` to `ID_CV` so there is no complete mismatch.
- `hair_curves` is used where necessary to distinguish from the
existing "curves" plural.
- I didn't rename any of the cycles/rendering code function names,
since that is also used by the old hair particle system.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14007
|
|
- "own" -> "its own"
- "it's" -> "its"
- Use proper plural
|
|
|
