| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed description of the issue see the commit
message for rB497cd3d7dd6e497be484eb78a8ddb23f53b20343
This change moves fftw to a shared library and reverts the bandaid
we did for 2.83.
|
|
This applies to masks as well.
Spotted while looking into T76872.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7788
|
|
Reviewers: sergey, brecht
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7787
|
|
- X / Y value orders are all consistent, between handles and the keyframe.
- Values are labeled consistently, with just "Frame" and "Value"
- The more important type property that can affect the others comes first.
- The "type" property provides nice visual separation between the
handle properties.
Reviewed By: sybren, billreynish
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7738
|
|
reapply changes from 30cbbccc6002 / D7764 that were only meant for
master. Sorry for the noise!
|
|
|
|
There are three different label styles for the three Dopesheet filter
labels:
- "Display Hidden", which uses "Display" rather than "Show" as the other
two options.
- "Show Errors", which does not use the word "only" to indicate it will
hide all the non-error channels.
- "Only Selected", so no "show" or "display" in the label at all.
This commit changes:
- Always use the word "Show", not "Display".
- Always use the word "Only" when enabling the filter hides everything
else.
Reviewed By: billreynish
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7742
|
|
When packing the image the height of the tile was checked to the width
of the packing area. This resulted that the tile was ignored.
Reviewed By: Clément Foucault
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7784
|
|
|
|
Reviewers: sebbas
|
|
That part only applies to master, sorry for the noise
|
|
Reviewers: sebbas
|
|
|
|
When showing UV edges after modifiers [draw_uvs_shadow], these were never
drawn anti-aliased [in contrast to the 'main' UVs].
Also: they did not respect the new 'UV Opacity' setting.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7764
|
|
|
|
This adds notifiers for backimage_move & backimage_fit.
Maniphest Tasks: T75694
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7778
|
|
|
|
This can be used by some add-ons.
|
|
The issue was that we used GL_ALWAYS for depth checking here which would
lead to the depth information from objects being messed up.
It would not represent which object was closest to the camera.
Reviewed By: Clément Foucault, Jeroen Bakker, Campbell Barton
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D7710
|
|
Mode
The issue was that we didn't convert the current rotational values.
We simply just switched mode without doing any data conversions.
|
|
Previously the playback mode "Frame Dropping" would not drop the correct
number of frames which would lead to slow playback.
For example, the playback target is 60fps. However we can only muster
around 32 fps.
The delta frames from the last step is in this case ~1.98 or so.
With the previous code, we would floor this. That would lead us to step
forward one frame each time, effectively playing back the animation at
half the speed as we will try to render every frame.
To fix this we simply save the remaining fraction from the previous
frame and use it to compute the current frame step.
Reviewed By: Sybren
Differential Revision: http://developer.blender.org/D7694
|
|
A follow up to T67212. I missed that the rotation interpolation had its
own code path.
The previous rotation push code was actually wrong (but smooth).
Now all of the actions behave correctly and is smoothly interpolated.
|
|
When using the mask modifier loose edges could be added to the mesh.
These edges weren't marked as loose edges and wasn't picked up by other
areas of blender.
This fix recalculates the loose edges so they have the correct flag
`ME_LOOSE_EDGE`.
Reviewed By: Sybren Stüvel
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7766
|
|
|
|
From what I can see, there are two issues at play in {T76689} and its merged-in report {T76590}:
- In Blender ≤ 2.79 the bone layer dots were updated in the draw code. This ensured the info was up to date before drawing. This is no longer possible, as the drawing code uses evaluated objects, and those should not be written to. This has been addressed in rB709f126e8143 by calling the update function explicitly in various places in the code. The problem is that this wasn't added to all necessary spots.
- When in edit mode, changes are made to the edit bones but not to the 'actual' bones (this is synced when exiting edit mode). This causes undo to mess up the layer indicators.
I think both issues can be addressed by having the dependency graph update the used layer info as part of the armature evaluation. This will make the undo system work properly, and allows the removal of some `BKE_armature_refresh_layer_used()` from various places.
There is still the issue that there are two functions (`BKE_armature_refresh_layer_used()` and `ED_armature_edit_refresh_layer_used()`) that are both responsible for updating `bArmature::layer_used`. This is a trickier thing to solve, though, as the definition of the `EditBone` struct resides in the armature editor module. This means that blenkernel can't iterate over edit bones, but on the other hand the dependency graph shouldn't call any editor functions either. This is why I left the `ED_armature_edit_refresh_layer_used()` calls untouched.
The downside of recalculating `layer_used` from the dependency graph (at least in the way that I did it now) is that it is called every time a user moves a bone in pose mode. This frequency of updates is not necessary.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7709
|
|
other scenes
Current implementation would update the nodetree of the freestyle scene not the composite scene.
Reviewed By: Dalai Felinto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7770
|
|
Side by side and top down views were rendered using an unset matrix.
This fix will reset the matrix just before copying the views to the
screen.
Reviewed By: Clément Foucault, Dalai Felinto
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7777
|
|
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to T76859
|
|
Caused by 5159b8e1eadb.
|
|
|
|
The interpolation function of the datalayer was misssing so the sculpt
mask data was corrupted every time a subdivision surface modifier was
applied.
Reviewed By: jbakker
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D7640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the number of triangles in a node became zero, the wireframe batch was
not freed along with the triangles batch and could still reference a freed
vertex buffer.
Ref T76858
|
|
This difference was intentional, but using the edge direction as normal is more useful.
|
|
|
|
That one was a bit more complicated, and is still only partial refactor
(ultimately we want to have a foreach_id callback in SpaceType itself I
think...).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
