Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff King <peff@peff.net>2021-10-05 23:36:07 +0300
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2021-10-09 01:45:14 +0300
commit5c5b29b459dd6e169c9114910adca9203532f7d7 (patch)
tree69b097ef2c9d4c79315d3821f0c66f526121b4ba /Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
parentc3660cfb031650b0fe384e3e27c06667f7ae5099 (diff)
cat-file: disable refs/replace with --batch-all-objects
When we're enumerating all objects in the object database, it doesn't make sense to respect refs/replace. The point of this option is to enumerate all of the objects in the database at a low level. By definition we'd already show the replacement object's contents (under its real oid), and showing those contents under another oid is almost certainly working against what the user is trying to do. Note that you could make the same argument for something like: git show-index <foo.idx | awk '{print $2}' | git cat-file --batch but there we can't know in cat-file exactly what the user intended, because we don't know the source of the input. They could be trying to do low-level debugging, or they could be doing something more high-level (e.g., imagine a porcelain built around cat-file for its object accesses). So in those cases, we'll have to rely on the user specifying "git --no-replace-objects" to tell us what to do. One _could_ make an argument that "cat-file --batch" is sufficiently low-level plumbing that it should not respect replace-objects at all (and the caller should do any replacement if they want it). But we have been doing so for some time. The history is a little tangled: - looking back as far as v1.6.6, we would not respect replace refs for --batch-check, but would for --batch (because the former used sha1_object_info(), and the replace mechanism only affected actual object reads) - this discrepancy was made even weirder by 98e2092b50 (cat-file: teach --batch to stream blob objects, 2013-07-10), where we always output the header using the --batch-check code, and then printed the object separately. This could lead to "cat-file --batch" dying (when it notices the size or type changed for a non-blob object) or even producing bogus output (in streaming mode, we didn't notice that we wrote the wrong number of bytes). - that persisted until 1f7117ef7a (sha1_file: perform object replacement in sha1_object_info_extended(), 2013-12-11), which then respected replace refs for both forms. So it has worked reliably this way for over 7 years, and we should make sure it continues to do so. That could also be an argument that --batch-all-objects should not change behavior (which this patch is doing), but I really consider the current behavior to be an unintended bug. It's a side effect of how the code is implemented (feeding the oids back into oid_object_info() rather than looking at what we found while reading the loose and packed object storage). The implementation is straight-forward: we just disable the global read_replace_refs flag when we're in --batch-all-objects mode. It would perhaps be a little cleaner to change the flag we pass to oid_object_info_extended(), but that's not enough. We also read objects via read_object_file() and stream_blob_to_fd(). The former could switch to its _extended() form, but the streaming code has no mechanism for disabling replace refs. Setting the global flag works, and as a bonus, it's impossible to have any "oops, we're sometimes replacing the object and sometimes not" bugs in the output (like the ones caused by 98e2092b50 above). The tests here cover the regular-input and --batch-all-objects cases, for both --batch-check and --batch. There is a test in t6050 that covers the regular-input case with --batch already, but this new one goes much further in actually verifying the output (plus covering --batch-check explicitly). This is perhaps a little overkill and the tests would be simpler just covering --batch-check, but I wanted to make sure we're checking that --batch output is consistent between the header and the content. The global-flag technique used here makes that easy to get right, but this is future-proofing us against regressions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-cat-file.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-cat-file.txt3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt b/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
index 6467707c6e..27b27e2b30 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-cat-file.txt
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ OPTIONS
any alternate object stores (not just reachable objects).
Requires `--batch` or `--batch-check` be specified. By default,
the objects are visited in order sorted by their hashes; see
- also `--unordered` below.
+ also `--unordered` below. Objects are presented as-is, without
+ respecting the "replace" mechanism of linkgit:git-replace[1].
--buffer::
Normally batch output is flushed after each object is output, so