get_revision(): honor the topo_order flag for boundary commits

Now get_revision() sorts the boundary commits when topo_order is set.
Since sort_in_topological_order() takes a struct commit_list, it first
places the boundary commits into revs->commits.

Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/graph.c b/graph.c
index 9b3495c461..26b8c5209e 100644
--- a/graph.c
+++ b/graph.c
@@ -195,16 +195,9 @@ static int graph_is_interesting(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
 	 * If revs->boundary is set, commits whose children have
 	 * been shown are always interesting, even if they have the
 	 * UNINTERESTING or TREESAME flags set.
-	 *
-	 * However, ignore the commit if SHOWN is set.  If SHOWN is set,
-	 * the commit is interesting, but it has already been printed.
-	 * This can happen because get_revision() doesn't return the
-	 * boundary commits in topological order, even when
-	 * revs->topo_order is set.
 	 */
 	if (graph->revs && graph->revs->boundary) {
-		if ((commit->object.flags & (SHOWN | CHILD_SHOWN)) ==
-		    CHILD_SHOWN)
+		if (commit->object.flags & CHILD_SHOWN)
 			return 1;
 	}