Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>2022-10-13 00:02:24 +0300
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2022-10-13 00:12:41 +0300
commit51243f9f0f6a932ea579fd6f8014b348f8c2a523 (patch)
tree336ac80d78c311a29fb9450f1c72899d2fdd528d /run-command.c
parent6a48b428b4c36c4f96ccb64a189658887c78be3f (diff)
run-command API: don't fall back on online_cpus()
When a "jobs = 0" is passed let's BUG() out rather than fall back on online_cpus(). The default behavior was added when this API was implemented in c553c72eed6 (run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor, 2015-12-15). Most of our code in-tree that scales up to "online_cpus()" by default calls that function by itself. Keeping this default behavior just for the sake of two callers means that we'd need to maintain this one spot where we're second-guessing the config passed down into pp_init(). The preceding commit has an overview of the API callers that passed "jobs = 0". There were only two of them (actually three, but they resolved to these two config parsing codepaths). The "fetch.parallel" caller already had a test for the "fetch.parallel=0" case added in 0353c688189 (fetch: do not run a redundant fetch from submodule, 2022-05-16), but there was no such test for "submodule.fetchJobs". Let's add one here. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'run-command.c')
-rw-r--r--run-command.c7
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
index 14a6e38e80..14ea409375 100644
--- a/run-command.c
+++ b/run-command.c
@@ -1564,8 +1564,8 @@ static void pp_init(struct parallel_processes *pp,
task_finished_fn task_finished,
void *data, int ungroup)
{
- if (n < 1)
- n = online_cpus();
+ if (!n)
+ BUG("you must provide a non-zero number of processes!");
pp->max_processes = n;
@@ -1835,8 +1835,7 @@ void run_processes_parallel_tr2(size_t n, get_next_task_fn get_next_task,
task_finished_fn task_finished, void *pp_cb,
const char *tr2_category, const char *tr2_label)
{
- trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d",
- ((n < 1) ? online_cpus() : n));
+ trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d", n);
run_processes_parallel(n, get_next_task, start_failure,
task_finished, pp_cb);