| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When 29f4332e66 (Quit passing 'now' to date code, 2019-09-11) removed
its timeval parameter, approxidate_relative() became equivalent to
approxidate(). Convert its last two call sites and remove the redundant
function.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix a memory leak in the parse_date_format() function by providing a
new date_mode_release() companion function.
By using this in "t/helper/test-date.c" we can mark the
"t0006-date.sh" test as passing when git is compiled with
SANITIZE=leak, and whitelist it to run under
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" by adding
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to the test itself.
The other tests that expose this memory leak (i.e. take the
"mode->type == DATE_STRFTIME" branch in parse_date_format()) are
"t6300-for-each-ref.sh" and "t7004-tag.sh". The former is due to an
easily fixed leak in "ref-filter.c", and brings the failures in
"t6300-for-each-ref.sh" down from 51 to 48.
Fixing the remaining leaks will have to wait until there's a
release_revisions() in "revision.c", as they have to do with leaks via
"struct rev_info".
There is also a leak in "builtin/blame.c" due to its call to
parse_date_format() to parse the "blame.date" configuration. However
as it declares a file-level "static struct date_mode blame_date_mode"
to track the data, LSAN will not report it as a leak. It's possible to
get valgrind(1) to complain about it with e.g.:
valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ./git -P -c blame.date=format:%Y blame README.md
But let's focus on things LSAN complains about, and are thus
observable with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". We should get to
fixing memory leaks in "builtin/blame.c", but as doing so would
require some re-arrangement of cmd_blame() let's leave it for some
other time.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add basic API doc comments to date.h, and while doing so move the the
parse_date_format() function adjacent to show_date(). This way all the
"struct date_mode" functions are grouped together. Documenting the
rest is one of our #leftoverbits.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Provide and use a DATE_MODE_INIT macro. Most of the users of struct
date_mode" use it via pretty.h's "struct pretty_print_context" which
doesn't have an initialization macro, so we're still bound to being
initialized to "{ 0 }" by default.
But we can change the couple of callers that directly declared a
variable on the stack to instead use the initializer, and thus do away
with the "mode.local = 0" added in add00ba2de9 (date: make "local"
orthogonal to date format, 2015-09-03).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Move the declaration of the date.c functions from cache.h, and adjust
the relevant users to include the new date.h header.
The show_ident_date() function belonged in pretty.h (it's defined in
pretty.c), its two users outside of pretty.c didn't strictly need to
include pretty.h, as they get it indirectly, but let's add it to them
anyway.
Similarly, the change to "builtin/{fast-import,show-branch,tag}.c"
isn't needed as far as the compiler is concerned, but since they all
use the "DATE_MODE()" macro we now define in date.h, let's have them
include it.
We could simply include this new header in "cache.h", but as this
change shows these functions weren't common enough to warrant
including in it in the first place. By moving them out of cache.h
changes to this API will no longer cause a (mostly) full re-build of
the project when "make" is run.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
