Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-04-14revisions API: have release_revisions() release "filter"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the "filter" in the "struct rev_info". This in combination with a preceding change to free "cmdline" means that we can mark another set of tests as passing under "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". The "filter" member was added recently in ffaa137f646 (revision: put object filter into struct rev_info, 2022-03-09), and this fixes leaks intruded in the subsequent leak 7940941de1f (pack-objects: use rev.filter when possible, 2022-03-09) and 105c6f14ad3 (bundle: parse filter capability, 2022-03-09). The "builtin/pack-objects.c" leak in 7940941de1f was effectively with us already, but the variable was referred to by a "static" file-scoped variable. The "bundle.c " leak in 105c6f14ad3 was newly introduced with the new "filter" feature for bundles. The "t5600-clone-fail-cleanup.sh" change here to add "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" is one of the cases where run-command.c in not carrying the abort() exit code upwards would have had that test passing before, but now it *actually* passes[1]. We should fix the lack of 1=1 mapping of SANITIZE=leak testing to actual leaks some other time, but it's an existing edge case, let's just mark the really-passing test as passing for now. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220303.86fsnz5o9w.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-08t/t5900-repo-selection.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitutionElia Pinto
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`. The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character. The patch was generated by: for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh") do perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}" done and then carefully proof-read. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03standardize and improve lookup rules for external local reposJeff King
When you specify a local repository on the command line of clone, ls-remote, upload-pack, receive-pack, or upload-archive, or in a request to git-daemon, we perform a little bit of lookup magic, doing things like looking in working trees for .git directories and appending ".git" for bare repos. For clone, this magic happens in get_repo_path. For everything else, it happens in enter_repo. In both cases, there are some ambiguous or confusing cases that aren't handled well, and there is one case that is not handled the same by both methods. This patch tries to provide (and test!) standard, sensible lookup rules for both code paths. The intended changes are: 1. When looking up "foo", we have always preferred a working tree "foo" (containing "foo/.git" over the bare "foo.git". But we did not prefer a bare "foo" over "foo.git". With this patch, we do so. 2. We would select directories that existed but didn't actually look like git repositories. With this patch, we make sure a selected directory looks like a git repo. Not only is this more sensible in general, but it will help anybody who is negatively affected by change (1) negatively (e.g., if they had "foo.git" next to its separate work tree "foo", and expect to keep finding "foo.git" when they reference "foo"). 3. The enter_repo code path would, given "foo", look for "foo.git/.git" (i.e., do the ".git" append magic even for a repo with working tree). The clone code path did not; with this patch, they now behave the same. In the unlikely case of a working tree overlaying a bare repo (i.e., a ".git" directory _inside_ a bare repo), we continue to treat it as a working tree (prefering the "inner" .git over the bare repo). This is mainly because the combination seems nonsensical, and I'd rather stick with existing behavior on the off chance that somebody is relying on it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>