diff options
| author | Ghostkeeper <rubend@tutanota.com> | 2022-04-20 14:37:01 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ghostkeeper <rubend@tutanota.com> | 2022-04-20 14:37:01 +0300 |
| commit | efc5f9d9b6a46499606aabf9d21b231c7970b13a (patch) | |
| tree | e25359e3f2af86f016121edd5051bcdb469b91d3 | |
| parent | 1a7667832f918781ca7d2e2e008f02708b6be07c (diff) | |
Also use end pieces in zig-zag infill pattern for single layer
In multi-layer infill, it added these end pieces properly, but not in single-layer infill. They should be added, because not adding them leaves loose endpoints for the infill which are a weak point. This is especially visible in 100% density since it leaves gaps then if the infill is slightly too thin to add another line.
I believe this was correct before, so I think a recent refactor accidentally set this to False.
Contributes to issue CURA-9077.
| -rw-r--r-- | src/FffGcodeWriter.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/FffGcodeWriter.cpp b/src/FffGcodeWriter.cpp index 904fa80e5..d620fdbd9 100644 --- a/src/FffGcodeWriter.cpp +++ b/src/FffGcodeWriter.cpp @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ bool FffGcodeWriter::processSingleLayerInfill(const SliceDataStorage& storage, L const auto pocket_size = mesh.settings.get<coord_t>("cross_infill_pocket_size"); constexpr bool skip_stitching = false; constexpr bool connected_zigzags = false; - constexpr bool use_endpieces = false; + constexpr bool use_endpieces = true; constexpr bool skip_some_zags = false; constexpr int zag_skip_count = 0; |