G M: Changes all references to "x inline" to "inline x" where x = _libcpp_always_inline or _libcpp_inline_visibility macros.

The patch touches these files:

locale
array
deque
new
string
utility
vector
__bit_reference
__split_buffer
locale_win32.h
 
There is no intended functionality change and it is expected that reversing the position of the inline keyword with regard to the other keywords does not change the meaning of anything, least not for apple/Linux etc.
 
It is intended to make libcxx more consistent with itself and to prevent the 1000 or so
"inline.cpp(3) : warning C4141: 'inline' : used more than once" warnings that MS's cl.exe compiler emits without this patch, i.e. if inline is not the first keyword before a function name etc.
 
Prefer "inline [other inline related keyword]" over "[other related keyword] inline".
After this patch, libcxx should be consistent to this pattern.

llvm-svn: 191987

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/libcxx/include/__split_buffer b/libcxx/include/__split_buffer
index f1c404f7741a..1d529cbe27d2 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__split_buffer
+++ b/libcxx/include/__split_buffer
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__construct_at_end(_ForwardIterator __first, _F
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, false_type)
 {
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, false_
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, true_type)
 {
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_begin(pointer __new_begin, true_t
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_end(pointer __new_last, false_type) _NOEXCEPT
 {
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_end(pointer __new_last, false_typ
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__destruct_at_end(pointer __new_last, true_type) _NOEXCEPT
 {
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer(size_type __cap, size_type __sta
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer()
     _NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_default_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
     : __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr)
@@ -336,14 +336,14 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer()
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer(__alloc_rr& __a)
     : __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr, __a)
 {
 }
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::__split_buffer(const __alloc_rr& __a)
     : __first_(nullptr), __begin_(nullptr), __end_(nullptr), __end_cap_(nullptr, __a)
 {
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::push_front(value_type&& __x)
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::push_back(const_reference __x)
 {
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>::emplace_back(_Args&&... __args)
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
 
 template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
-_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY inline
+inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
 void
 swap(__split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>& __x, __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator>& __y)
         _NOEXCEPT_(_NOEXCEPT_(__x.swap(__y)))