diff options
author | Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> | 2000-10-17 20:16:12 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> | 2000-10-17 20:16:12 +0400 |
commit | bf55ece1c17d31f082e3a7df44e605218b1f03f1 (patch) | |
tree | 068f53a9614cf66c66222bf004aa74c3cc3fe365 /FAQ | |
parent | 51754ec835d4d8c594d11c1cb1d35c5f41c6df21 (diff) |
Two questions have been asked quite often lately.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ')
-rw-r--r-- | FAQ | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha True64 Unix? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"? +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? +* Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used? * Which is the current version of OpenSSL? @@ -430,3 +432,29 @@ and then redo the compilation. What you should really do is make sure '/usr/ccs/bin' is permanently in your $PATH, for example through your '.profile' (again, assuming you use a sh-compatible shell). + +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? + +Sometimes, you may get reports from VC++ command line (cl) that it +can't find standard include files like stdio.h and other weirdnesses. +One possible cause is that the environment isn't correctly set up. +To solve that problem, one should run VCVARS32.BAT which is found in +the 'bin' subdirectory of the VC++ installation directory (somewhere +under 'Program Files'). This needs to be done prior to running NMAKE, +and the changes are only valid for the current DOS session. + + +* Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used? + +autoconf is a nice tool, but is unfortunately very Unix-centric. +Although one can come up with solution to have ports keep in track, +there's also some work needed for that, and can be quite painful at +times. If there was a 'autoconf'-like tool that generated perl +scripts or something similarly general, it would probably be used +in OpenSSL much earlier. + +libtool has repeatadly been reported by some members of the OpenSSL +development and others to be a pain to use. So far, those in the +development team who have said anything about this have expressed +a wish to avoid libtool for that reason. + |