diff options
author | Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> | 2002-08-15 14:50:31 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> | 2002-08-15 14:50:31 +0400 |
commit | f742e497dd0f90da69aabfbe5d32ecede3eb0749 (patch) | |
tree | d0cc6593d98e75a183e19a7b46f6afe0b165e9b4 /FAQ | |
parent | dcc426fcfe4be56f0782c76752e20835f657cb86 (diff) |
Add a FAQ entry for yet another bc failure.
PR: 199
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ')
-rw-r--r-- | FAQ | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols? * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"? * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"? * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? @@ -402,6 +403,17 @@ and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"? + +On some DG/ux versions, bc seems to have a too small stack for calculations +that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it. This gets triggered when you run the +test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is "bc: stack empty". + +The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc +and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html +for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. + + * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix? On some Alpha installations running Tru64 Unix and Compaq C, the compilation |