diff options
author | Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> | 2022-10-25 13:08:52 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> | 2022-10-25 13:08:52 +0300 |
commit | fb2268a806682538935123ae97a77f73ef296d4c (patch) | |
tree | 3fa1cda5d8288065a4c45e4ac4e93f527caf885a | |
parent | ce0c0e08f44420dd6259d09fcf3f7e2e01c46fa3 (diff) |
Add meeting minutes for 2022-10-25
-rw-r--r-- | meeting-minutes/minutes-2022-10-25.txt | 155 |
1 files changed, 155 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-minutes/minutes-2022-10-25.txt b/meeting-minutes/minutes-2022-10-25.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..763e7ed --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-minutes/minutes-2022-10-25.txt @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +Meeting Date: 2022-10-25 +Minutes taken by: Hugo +Attendees: + Hugo Landau + Dmitry Belyavskiy + Matthias St Pierre + Tomas Mraz + Matt Caswell + Richard Levitte + Shane Lontis + Paul Dale + +External attendees: + Daniel Fiala + Martin Koci + +Agenda: + + * Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda + * Agree minutes from previous meeting + * Review outstanding actions + * Review outstanding security issues + * 3.1 release PRs and issues + * FIPS 140-3 + * Review issues with OTC hold (30 minutes) + * Review draft technical policies + * Agree agenda for next meeting + * AOB + +** Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda + +Hugo volunteered to take the minutes. +Proposed: Hugo, seconded: Matt + +Agenda for the meeting agreed. Proposed: Hugo, seconded: Matt + +** Agree minutes from previous meeting + +Minutes from previous meeting were agreed. Proposed: Hugo, seconded: Tomas + +** Review outstanding actions + +AI: Richard to create instructions on how to add an OTC member. +Not done + +AI: Martin to email information about the OTC F2F meeting plan to the OTC list +Done + +AI: Matt to create a proposal on return values and return value types for new +code. +Not done + +AI: Martin to email information on his proposals for measuring outstanding GH +PRs and issues to the OTC list +Done + +AI: Hugo to write improved process proposal in next sprint +Not done + +AI: Hugo to write a proposed change to the test policy + to add four tracking labels classifying if a PR needs or has tests +Done + +AI: Nicola requests that people read the latest comments in the EC + compression (#16624, #18320). +Not done + +** Review outstanding security issues + +We discussed outstanding security issues. + +** 3.1 release PRs and issues + +Tomas created a list of 150 PRs for backport to 3.1 +No objections were raised to using this list as a starting point +Objections may be raised by OMC tomorrow +We will do the review in batches. We will keep the approvals +of the original PRs and keep the approval headers in the commits. + +In the meantime, PRs which cherrypick cleanly to 3.0 and 3.1 can +simply be merged. + +PRs which don't cherrypick cleanly will have to wait for the batches +of cherry picks to complete and will be reviewed afterwards. + +** FIPS 140-3 + +AI: Pauli to consider options for implementing KAT using deterministic RNG + in a safer manner + +** Review issues with OTC hold (30 minutes) + +#19401 (make CMAC properly fail if cipher is not CBC mode): + - Can this be backported to 3.0? + OTC: No + - Can this be backported to 3.1? + OTC: Yes + +#19419 (finer grained error records for provider load init failures) + - Can this be backported to 3.0? + OTC: Yes, this is a bug and the fix can be backported + +#19489 (remove old RSA CRT names) + - There was consensus that where and when this is fixed, it should be fixed + via a compile time breaking change and not a runtime breaking change. + - There was consensus that this should be fixed in 4.0 at the latest. + - OTC: We do not want to make the breaking changes proposed in 3.x. Some parts + of the PR are still OK for 3.x and should be split into a separate PR. + - Documentation in 3.x should be updated to warn against using these defines. + +** Review draft technical policies + +#57 (revise testing policy with labels) + - Pauli suggested if tests: deferred is used, the person adding the label + should create an issue for the tests at the same time. + We decided against updating the proposal at this time. + This could be proposed in a future policy change. + + - We discussed the proposed testing policy. There were no objections. + OTC: This should be put to a vote once the two week period is up. + +** Agree agenda for next meeting + + * Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda + * Agree minutes from previous meeting + * Discussion of Buildbot CI issues + * Review outstanding actions + * Review outstanding security issues + * EC compression format compatibility discussion + * Review issues with OTC hold (30 minutes) + * Review draft technical policies + * Agree agenda for next meeting + * AOB + +** AOB + +We discussed possible locations and dates for an OTC F2F meeting. +Dmitry proposed this be discussed further via email. + +We discussed Buildbot CI issues and agreed to schedule this for the +next meeting. + +[Matthias left the meeting.] + +** New and carried over action items [transported from above]: + +AI: Richard to create instructions on how to add an OTC member. + +AI: Matt to create a proposal on return values and return value types for new +code. + +AI: Hugo to write improved design process proposal + +AI: Nicola requests that people read the latest comments in the EC + compression (#16624, #18320). |