Welcome to mirror list, hosted at ThFree Co, Russian Federation.

gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss.git - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGitLab Bot <gitlab-bot@gitlab.com>2020-12-16 18:10:18 +0300
committerGitLab Bot <gitlab-bot@gitlab.com>2020-12-16 18:10:18 +0300
commit6364c14cc1f445d471bca118dca5af5a85b2c5dc (patch)
tree2579c5592f207e86ff7a0c5c7499caad723cdec1 /doc/development/renaming_features.md
parent5a2284f3500088e04cf3a5854fb06dc9db2b6077 (diff)
Add latest changes from gitlab-org/gitlab@master
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/renaming_features.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/renaming_features.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/renaming_features.md b/doc/development/renaming_features.md
index 2a94fd2cbc3..f7fc1c11e37 100644
--- a/doc/development/renaming_features.md
+++ b/doc/development/renaming_features.md
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The more of the following that are true, the more likely you should choose the f
- You are not confident the new name is permanent.
- The feature is susceptible to bugs (large, complex, needing refactor, etc).
-- The renaming will be difficult to review (feature spans many lines, files, or repositories).
-- The renaming will be disruptive in some way (database table renaming).
+- The renaming is difficult to review (feature spans many lines, files, or repositories).
+- The renaming is disruptive in some way (database table renaming).
## Consider a façade-first approach
-The façade approach is not necessarily a final step. It can (and possibly *should*) be treated as the first step, where later iterations will accomplish the complete rename.
+The façade approach is not necessarily a final step. It can (and possibly *should*) be treated as the first step, where later iterations accomplish the complete rename.