Do less nanosleep loops.unlock_task_scheduler

tested that already without much change yesterday, but for some reasons
today it gives me another 2-3% speedup in both test files.

And it should also mitigate the (supposed) almost-starving situation,
hopefully.

2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/source/blender/blenlib/BLI_task.h b/source/blender/blenlib/BLI_task.h
index d27bf4dad20..a551124375e 100644
--- a/source/blender/blenlib/BLI_task.h
+++ b/source/blender/blenlib/BLI_task.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void BLI_task_pool_work_and_wait(TaskPool *pool);
 void BLI_task_pool_cancel(TaskPool *pool);
 
 /* set number of threads allowed to be used by this pool */
-void BLI_pool_set_num_threads(TaskPool *pool, int num_threads);
+void BLI_pool_set_num_threads(TaskPool *pool, size_t num_threads);
 
 /* for worker threads, test if canceled */
 bool BLI_task_pool_canceled(TaskPool *pool);
diff --git a/source/blender/blenlib/intern/task.c b/source/blender/blenlib/intern/task.c
index e53327640fb..f3ad071b884 100644
--- a/source/blender/blenlib/intern/task.c
+++ b/source/blender/blenlib/intern/task.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 #define MEMPOOL_SIZE 256
 
 /* Parameters controlling how much we spin in nanosleeps before switching to real condition-controlled sleeping. */
-#define NANOSLEEP_MAX_SPINNING 1000   /* Number of failed attempt to get a task before going to condition waiting. */
+#define NANOSLEEP_MAX_SPINNING 200   /* Number of failed attempt to get a task before going to condition waiting. */
 #define NANOSLEEP_DURATION (const struct timespec[]){{0, 200L}}  /* Nanosleep duration (in nano-seconds). */
 
 typedef struct Task {
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ void BLI_task_pool_work_and_wait(TaskPool *pool)
 	}
 }
 
-void BLI_pool_set_num_threads(TaskPool *pool, size_t num_threads_max)
+void BLI_pool_set_num_threads(TaskPool *pool, size_t num_threads)
 {
 	/* NOTE: Don't try to modify threads while tasks are running! */
 	pool->num_threads = num_threads;