| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
If the edge you are going to slide along is very close to in line
with the adjacent beveled edge, then there will be sharp overshoots.
There is an epsilon comparison to just abandon loop slide if this
situation is happening. That epsilon used to be 0.25 radians, but
bug T86768 complained that that value was too high, so it was changed
to .0001 radians (5 millidegrees). Now this current bug shows that
that was too aggressively small, so this change ups it by a factor
of 10, to .001 radians (5 centidegrees). All previous bug reports
remained fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 94866ef84f1907116409f8fe9c1f313405
A number of reports of bevel regressions came after the
commit to fix bevel intersection continuity.
Since the fix for some of those regressions is not obvious
we will revert the continuity improvement and do it as
part of the Bevel V2 project.
|
|
Also add missing task-ID reference & remove colon after \note as it
doesn't render properly in doxygen.
|
|
|
|
The uv fix just submitted had a bug where I forgot to wrap around
after adding 1. This apparently worked anyway in a debug build
but not in release build, hence the buildbot tests were failing.
|
|
Also remove unnecessary uses of `struct` and add const in one place.
|
|
The UV fix just committed had gotten out of sync with some changes
that had been made inside some comments (spelling and folding).
|
|
This substantially redoes the logic by which bevel chooses, for
the middle segment when there are an odd number of segments,
which face to interpolate in, and which vertices to snap to which
edges before doing that interpolation. It changes the UV layouts
of a number of the regression tests, for the better.
An example, in the reference bug, is a cube with all seams, unwrapped
and then packed with some margin around them, now looks much
better in UV space when there are an odd number of segments.
|
|
Follow naming from T85728.
|
|
The constant M_PI_4 is added to GLSL to ensure it works there too.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D14288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use a shorter/simpler license convention, stops the header taking so
much space.
Follow the SPDX license specification: https://spdx.org/licenses
- C/C++/objc/objc++
- Python
- Shell Scripts
- CMake, GNUmakefile
While most of the source tree has been included
- `./extern/` was left out.
- `./intern/cycles` & `./intern/atomic` are also excluded because they
use different header conventions.
doc/license/SPDX-license-identifiers.txt has been added to list SPDX all
used identifiers.
See P2788 for the script that automated these edits.
Reviewed By: brecht, mont29, sergey
Ref D14069
|
|
|
|
Bevel Vertices did not use vertex/bevel weights if the Width Type
was set to Width or Depth.
|
|
|
|
This patch from Henrik Dick improves the continuity between the
grid forming corners and the edge polyons on multisegment bevels.
For details, see patch D13867.
|
|
Some minor improvements to doc-strings too.
Ref T92709
|
|
|
|
A previous commit, c56526d8b68ab, which sometimes didn't drop offsets
into 'in plane' faces, as a fix to T71329, was overly aggressive.
If all the intermediate edges are in the same plane then it is fine
to just put the meeting point on the plane of the start and end edges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years ago, Bug T44961 about unwanted spikes had me not do a loop
slide if the angle was too extreme, to avoid unwanted spikes.
The current bug showed that that angle was much too big, and limited
desired behavior in many cases. Changing the angle from 0.25 radians
to 0.0001 radians (about 0.006 degrees) still fixes the original bug
and seems very unlikely to be limiting desired behavior now.
|
|
This shows the text as part of the assertion message.
|
|
Also use doxy style function reference `#` prefix chars when
referencing identifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These were limited to obvious cases. Some less obvious cases
were kept as refactoring might make them necessary in future.
|
|
|
|
When polygons around a bevel are rebuilt, sometimes UVs are merged
around a new vertex in the case of the face opposite a single edge
being beveled on a 3-edge vertex. This should not have been done
if any of the edges at that vertex were a seam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
While Boolean is not guaranteed to work if the operands are not
volume-enclosing (technically: PWN - piecewise constant winding number),
it needs to do something in those cases. This change makes
more cases meet user expectations in T84493, T64544, T83403,
T82642 (though very slow on that one).
The original new boolean code used "generalized winding number"
for this fallback; replaced this with code that uses raycasting.
Raycasting would have been faster, but for unfortunately also
switchd to per-triangle tests rather than per-patch tests since
it is possible (e.g., with Suzanne) to have patches that are
both inside and outside the other shape. That can make it much
slower in some cases, sadly.
|
|
|
|
The previous fix to the width modes Percent and Absolute did
not take into account that with limit mode Weight, the amount
needs to be scaled by the bevel weight of the beveled edge in
question. (Sometimes there are two beveled edges in question,
in which case an average is used.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Needed a better normal to for plane to offset into when there are
non in-plane edges between two beveled edges. It was using the vertex
normal, which is just wrong.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9508
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes debugging slightly easier, and makes the code slightly more
explicit about its intentions.
|
|
In some situations where two beveled edges were very close to in-line
but not quite straight, bevel would build a miter when it shouldn't.
The code that chose whether to use a miter at each vertex was slightly
incorrect.
For outer miters there is a check for 3 or more selected edges, but an
inner miter can still be useful with only two beveled edges at a vertex,
so we can't use that here. Instead I changed the check for in-line edges
to run before determining whether the angle is reflex or not. The logic
ends up a bit more straightforward as well. This doesn't completely
remove the rather strange looking triangle vertex meshes at each corner,
but it does make it stable when locations are slightly adjusted.
The only other place this `edges_angle_kind` function was used is for
profile=1.0 vertex meshes. I tested and made sure that still works well.
Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D9420
|
