[libcxx][atomic] Remove workaround for PR31864

I believe the origin issue in PR31864 has been addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566.

As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53840, `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE == 2` sometimes is not consistent with `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free`, since the macro takes `long long`'s ABI alignment into account. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213 proposed we should not rely on ABI alignment of types, thus we have consistent `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` and `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free` on x86's old cpu. Currently, I plan to move on to remove the workaround which should have been addressed and don't want to break current tests.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119931

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 35 deletions

diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
index 477208ad18c5..2d72b9169f94 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/atomics/atomics.lockfree/isalwayslockfree.pass.cpp
@@ -29,40 +29,6 @@ template <typename T> void checkAlwaysLockFree() {
     assert(std::atomic<T>().is_lock_free());
 }
 
-// FIXME: This separate test is needed to work around llvm.org/PR31864
-// which causes ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE to be defined as '1' in 32-bit builds
-// even though __atomic_always_lock_free returns true for the same type.
-constexpr bool NeedWorkaroundForPR31864 =
-#if defined(__clang__)
-(sizeof(void*) == 4); // Needed on 32 bit builds
-#else
-false;
-#endif
-
-template <bool Disable = NeedWorkaroundForPR31864,
-  std::enable_if_t<!Disable>* = nullptr,
-  class LLong = long long,
-  class ULLong = unsigned long long>
-void checkLongLongTypes() {
-  static_assert(std::atomic<LLong>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
-  static_assert(std::atomic<ULLong>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
-}
-
-// Used to make the calls to __atomic_always_lock_free dependent on a template
-// parameter.
-template <class T> constexpr size_t getSizeOf() { return sizeof(T); }
-
-template <bool Enable = NeedWorkaroundForPR31864,
-  std::enable_if_t<Enable>* = nullptr,
-  class LLong = long long,
-  class ULLong = unsigned long long>
-void checkLongLongTypes() {
-  constexpr bool ExpectLockFree = __atomic_always_lock_free(getSizeOf<LLong>(), 0);
-  static_assert(std::atomic<LLong>::is_always_lock_free == ExpectLockFree, "");
-  static_assert(std::atomic<ULLong>::is_always_lock_free == ExpectLockFree, "");
-  static_assert((0 != ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE) == ExpectLockFree, "");
-}
-
 void run()
 {
 // structs and unions can't be defined in the template invocation.
@@ -140,7 +106,8 @@ void run()
     static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned int>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE), "");
     static_assert(std::atomic<long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
     static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
-    checkLongLongTypes();
+    static_assert(std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
+    static_assert(std::atomic<unsigned long long>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE), "");
     static_assert(std::atomic<void*>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_POINTER_LOCK_FREE), "");
     static_assert(std::atomic<std::nullptr_t>::is_always_lock_free == (2 == ATOMIC_POINTER_LOCK_FREE), "");